Unless you’re so poor at spelling or English in general that a spell-checker wouldn’t do you much good anyway, there isn’t really any excuse for this sort of thing.
Read More
spelling
5 minute tip: Spellchecker blues (Updated)
in 5 Minute Tip
Some time ago I wrote: “Paradoxically, a spell-checker is only useful if you can spell! It's a common misunderstanding that if you can't spell, a spell-checker will sort things out for you. It won't.” Is this still true?
Read More
5 minute tip: Spellchecker blues
in 5 Minute Tip
Paradoxically, a spell-checker is only useful if you can spell! It's a common misunderstanding that if you can't spell, a spell-checker will sort things out for you. It won't.
Read More
5 minute tip: Using a spell-checker
Spellcheckers are useful, even essential. But don't rely on them exclusively.
Read MoreDo writers need to be able to spell?
According to newspaper reports, the educational academic Sugatra Mitra, lessons in spelling 'have no place in 21st century schools'. His view is that the technology will sort it out for you.
I suppose he is thinking of things like predictive text, because he says:
No excuse for poor spelling
in Language, News & views
Unless you’re so poor at spelling or English in general that a spell-checker wouldn’t do you much good anyway, there isn’t really any excuse for this sort of thing